The convergence of modern phylogenetics, genetics and evolutionary development (EVO-DEVO) has allowed us to make better and better hypotheses about the evolutionary history of plants, for which the fossil record still leaves many gaps. There is another dimension to this fascinating pursuit, an older one that isn't talked about as much: the analysis of adaptive or evolutionary trends. This was the core logic of evolutionary biology through much of the twentieth century, before cladistic analysis came to dominate. The publication of "Flowering Plants: Evolution above the Species Level" by G. L. Stebbins in 1974 represented the finest of this approach. Far from being obsolete, the thought processes of Stebbins and other 20th century evolutionary biologists are still applicable to the various, sometimes controversial theories that are appearing currently. In my opinion, Stebbins' book should be required reading for all graduate students of evolution.
Adaptive modification along the lines of least resistance
One of the general principles of evolutionary biology is that evolutionary change, under the force of natural selection, will tend to proceed along the lines of least resistance - i.e. the simplest route. For example, a leafless cactus adapts to epiphytic life in the rain forest, not by reconstructing the leaves abandoned by its ancestors, but by flattening its stem segments into leaf-like units (e.g. genus Schlumbergia - the Christmas cactus). This is one aspect of the bigger picture of evolutionary canalization, which essentially states that the possible adaptations of a plant species or individual organs are limited by what they already are. A coconut has little prospect of evolving into an orchid-like capsule with millions of tiny, wind-pollinated seeds, just as an elephant has little prospect of evolving wings (or flying with its ears!).
Let me expand upon one of Stebbins' most lucid examples. Suppose there is selective pressure for an increase in seed production. This could occur for a variety of reasons: improved growing conditions, adaptation to a sunnier environment where smaller seeds can be created in greater numbers, and/or an increase in the numbers of seed-eating animals present. All could all favor a species that increases its output. How a species would respond to such a challenge would depend on its starting equipment.
In species that have a fixed number of ovules in each carpel, but a variable number of carpels in each flower, the number of carpels can be increased. This is what happens in something like a strawberry (see "Why are the seeds of a strawberry on the outside?"). The tiny fruits of the strawberry (the seed-like structures on the outside of the swollen receptacle) are adapted as achenes. The number of seeds in each tiny carpel is rigidly fixed at one. It would take an extraordinary amount of genetic and developmental reorganization to increase the number of seeds within each achene, which in the process would have to adapt to a different dispersal strategy. The meristem in the center of the flower, which produces the carpels sequentially, however, can continue to operate a little longer and easily produce many more single-seeded carpels.
the number of carpels might be increased.
In a third "starting point," we have sunflowers and their relatives (family Asteraceae), in which flowers are highly canalized. The actual flowers are tiny and crowded onto a dense head. Each contains a single seed in a highly specialized ovary. It is inconceivable that a pressure for higher seed output would result in more seeds or more carpels being produced in each flower. It is vastly simpler to increase the number of flowers within the composite head. This is what we see in the massive cultivated sunflowers, which have evolved under human selection, compared with their wild relatives.
The imperative of evolutionary canalization, and modification along the lines of least resistance can be stronger than the imperative of parsimony in phylogenetic analysis. It is the basis for my conclusion that the single-seeded drupes of Amborella represented a specialization from a more flexible common ancestor (see "What's so primitive about Amborella.") I will also invoke these principles in some upcoming posts.
References cited
Stebbins, G. L. 1974. Flowering Plants: Evolution above the Species Level. Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Essays, botanical travelogues, and other resources provided for students, instructors and anyone else seeking a deeper understanding of the nature of plants. Proceed below for recent posts or go to the Table of Contents (in the column to the right) for an organized list of topics.
Wednesday, July 16, 2014
Tuesday, July 1, 2014
What's so primitive about Amborella?
![]() |
The male flowers of Amborella are crowded with stamens. Photo by Scott Zona, posted on Wikipedia |
Amborella is in the same position relative to angiosperms in genera, as Acorus is to other monocots. I argued in a recent post (What's so primitive about Acorus?), however, that being at the tip of a very long evolutionary branch does not necessarily mean being exactly the same as the very first members of that branch. It is likely in fact that some changes have been made as conditions and competition changed over the tens of millions of years since that ancient phylogenetic split. I identified several ways in which Acorus was probably more advanced than some other archaic monocots that branched off slightly later.
To be sure, Amborella trichopoda, has retained a number of truly archaic features. For one thing, it has the most primitive wood (consisting only of tracheids), of any living angiosperm (Carlquist & Schneider 2001). It also has very basic flowers, as we'll see below.
Amborella occurs in the rain forests of New Caledonian, a gentle environment isolated from both climate change and the hotbeds of aggressive evolution on the continents. Other relics of past ages survive in similar habitats, including the nearly-as-ancient order Austrobaileyales.
If we include the Austrobaileyales and the Nymphaeales with Amborella in our analysis, we can create a more general picture of the ancestral angiosperm. Together these three clades are referred to as the ANITA grade, and contrast with the higher angiosperms of the magnolids, eudiots, and monocots. Each can be assumed to have a different mix of ancestral and specialized characteristics. The likely characteristics of the ancestral flower have been in fact derived from a study of this group (Endress 2001).
In this model, the ancestor of all known angiosperms had bisexual flowers consisting of simple, separate organs: tepals, stamens and carpels, which were spirally arranged and indefinite in number. Advancements from this model, such as carpels fused into a compound pistil, stamens in whorls of definite numbers, and tepals in two distinct whorls of sepals and petals, show up in various higher groups at different times.
Three other aspects of the carpels are also part of the model:
1. carpels are unsealed. They are open just below the stigmatic region, and entry of dirt, pathogens and small animals is blocked only by a drop of fluid. This contrasts with most modern carpels, which are completely sealed by a tight suture.
2. carpels are ascidiate, i.e. urn-shaped. The wall of the carpel is smooth and seamless, like a sock pulled up around its contents. This contrasts both with earlier accepted models of the first angiosperm carpels, and those of most modern angiosperms, which are plicate (folded). In the plicate model, a row of ovules along each margin of an ancient, leaf-like structure were brought inside as the margins joined together in a tight suture.
3. carpels contain just a few ovules placed opposite the backbone of the carpel, though there is some variation. Amborella has just one ovule, some waterlilies have many.
![]() |
The carpel of Amborella is ascidate and unsealed at the top, though the stigma region shows a folded structure consistent with the plicate model of the carpel. Drawing from Bailey & Swamy (1948) |
The flowers are also unisexual, with pollen-producing flowers on separate plants from those that bear ovule-producing flowers. Such an arrangement is likely a means of avoiding self-pollination (Ferrandiz et al. 2010). Similar patterns can be seen in a variety of other plants, such as date palms. The fact that the female flowers contain sterile stamens between the tepals and the carpels is compelling evidence that the ancestors of Amborella did indeed have bisexual flowers. This has recently been confirmed by Sauchet et al. (2017).
The fruits of Amborella are described as small drupes. These are fleshy fruits with large seeds filled with food reserves, typically adapted for germination in shady forests. Drupes are found among many different families of flowering plants, but to my knowledge are always the endpoints of evolution from more generalized ancestors with flexible ovule production. In the Rose family, for example, drupes are found in the genus Prunus (plums, cherries, etc.), a specialized genus in a family that includes a wide variety of fruit types.
![]() |
The bisexual flowers of Austrobaileya have a number of carpels, each containing two rows of ovules, as well as flattened, blade-like stamens. Source: http://www.naturalist.if.ua/?p=3585 |
In sum, Amborella is likely specialized in its floral display, unisexual flowers, and single-seeded carpels. In other ways, it does show its age: wood without vessels, simple, separate flower parts of indefinite numbers, and unsealed carpels. Its present very limited distribution in forests of New Caledonia attest to its archaic status and its proximity to extinction. The few ways in which it has specialized are probably the keys to it still being with us.
This discussion leads to a deeper question of the nature of the first angiosperm carpels, which evolved well before the common ancestor of living angiosperms. Were they ascidiate or plicate? The ascidiate carpel itself may be an adaptation for making berries and drupes, maybe nuts and achenes as well, but does not lend itself to carpels that must reopen as capsules, follicles or legumes. So were the very first carpels fleshy berries? I'll take that up in a future post.
References:
Bailey I. W. and Swamy B. G. L. 1948 Amborella trichopoda Baill., a new morphological type of vesselless dicotyledon. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 29: 245–254.
Endress, P. K. 2001. The Flowers in Extant Basal Angiosperms and Inferences on Ancestral Flowers
International Journal of Plant Sciences 162 (5): 1111- 1140
Thien, L. B. , T. L. Sage, T. Jaffré, P. Bernhardt, V. Pontieri, P. H. Weston, D. Malloch, H. Azuma, S. W. Graham, M. A. McPherson, H. S. Rai, R. F. Sage and J-L. Dupre. 2003. The Population Structure and Floral Biology of Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae) Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 90 (3): 466-490.
Sauquet, Hervé, Balthazar, Maria von …Schönenberger,Jürg. 2017 The ancestral flower of angiosperms and its early diversification. Nature Communications volume 8, Article number: 16047
Tuesday, June 24, 2014
Mosses of Central Florida 6. Ditrichum pallidum
![]() |
Ditrichum pallidum plants are like tiny clumps of grass. |
Ditrichum pallidum (Hedw.) Hampe (Ditrichaceae) is one of the grass-like mosses. Each shoot consists of
a clump of elongate, grass-like leaves that consist mostly of an elongate midrib (costa). Cells in the upper section are elongate-rectangular, but overlapping and hard to distinguish. The actual blade of the leaf flares out briefly at the base, where one can see relatively large ovate to rectangular cells. The capsules rise from elongate, straight stalks, and and remain more-or-less upright throughout. At maturity, the capsules are narrow, nearly cylindrical, and with a single row of short teeth around the mouth, attached just below the surface.
Most of the leaf is the thick, prolonged tip of the midrib, with elongate-rectangular cells. |
![]() |
Near the base, one can find the thin, flaring blade, with ovate to rectangular cells. |
![]() |
When dry, the capsules are nearly cylindric, with blunt tips. Just inside the mouth is a single row of small teeth. |
Thursday, May 29, 2014
Medicinal plants in our own backyard
The discovery of plants with medicinal or health-promoting properties began with indigenous cultures around the world thousands of years ago. The practice of herbal medicine is truly the "oldest profession," and even pre-dates humanity. Chimpanzees are known to seek out certain plants in their native forests that can relieve illness or discomfort. One such plant comes from a shrub native to the forests of Africa called Aspilia (Asteraceae), which has been shown to kill bacteria, fungi and nematodes in the intestinal tract. It may also serve as a stimulant - the morning coffee for chimps. Each culture has discovered useful plants in their own backyards, and modern medicine is now slowly exploring that priceless knowledge and verifying what these people have known for a long time.
So it was a personal surprise to me - even though I teach a course in Medicinal Botany - that a plant frequently found in my own backyard has within it compounds that may cure malaria. The plant is Argemone mexicana, the prickly poppy. The new information was featured in the recent issue (June 2014) of Scientific American, in the article "Seeds of a Cure," by Brendan Borrell. The article describes the efforts by researchers working in the field in Africa, Mali to be specific, to document the effectiveness of the plant among people taking this natural medicine as an herbal tea. The researchers documented a successful cure rate of about 89%, which compares quite favorably with the 95% rate of the much more expensive conventional treatments based on artemisin.
I went back to my classic textbook on medicinal botany by Lewis and Lewis, and found mention of prickly poppy as treatment for heart arrhythmias, but not malaria. So I didn't feel so stupid then, but a still little bit ignorant compared with the native African healers who have been using this for over a century. The plant is native to tropical America, and was introduced into Africa sometime in the 19th century, which means the native healers there caught onto its medicinal properties fairly quickly! We tend to think of traditional healers in general as following procedures cast in stone hundreds or thousands of years ago - a clearly unjustified stereotype. In this instance at least, there were intellectually flexible experimenters in the profession.
So what are the active principles in prickly poppy tea? The Lewis text indicates a-allocrytopine obtained from the roots as the active principle in treatment of heart arrhythmia. It also indicates that a more toxic mix of sanguinarine, berberine, protopine is present in the plants, and that prickly poppy occasionally contaminates grain. This may be from the seeds of the prickly poppy, which have been implicated in poisoning events in India. Sanguinarine is considered the primary culprit.
The leaves, however, have little sanguinarine, and the herbal tea, according to Borrell, is fairly non-toxic. Isolated berberine has shown some anti-malarial effect, but much weaker than that of whole leaf infusions. So it is not known exactly what mix of compounds in the leaves is so potent against malaria.
Argemone mexicana might turn out to be the tip of an iceberg. There are 32 species in this genus, native mostly to tropical America, with one species in Hawaii. Relationship among plants is highly predictive of similarity in secondary plant compounds. These other species may have similar or even better combinations of compounds for treating malaria or other parasites.
This is not to mention the numerous other genera and species of the poppy family. One must of course be very careful to steer away from the dangerous compounds found throughout this family, including the opiates in Papaver somniferum. As I say on the first day of my medical botany course: "DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME!" Self-experimentation with natural plant compounds is exceedingly risky. If you can get a hold of the Lewis text, there is an excellent section on all the ways people inadvertently poison themselves.
The study of medicinal botany is both ancient and very new. The new part is applying the modern scientific method to finding and verifying the curative or preventative properties of plant compounds. The possibilities and opportunities in this field are endless.
References:
Borrell, Brendan. 2014. Seeds of a Cure. Scientific American 310 (#6): 64-69.
Lewis, W. H. and M. P. F. Elvin-Lewis. 2003. Medical Botany, 2nd Ed., John Wiley and Sons.
![]() |
The prickly poppy, Argemone mexicana, was introduced into Africa in the 19th century and has been used as a medication against malaria almost as long. Photo by B. Navez, posted in Wikipedia. |
I went back to my classic textbook on medicinal botany by Lewis and Lewis, and found mention of prickly poppy as treatment for heart arrhythmias, but not malaria. So I didn't feel so stupid then, but a still little bit ignorant compared with the native African healers who have been using this for over a century. The plant is native to tropical America, and was introduced into Africa sometime in the 19th century, which means the native healers there caught onto its medicinal properties fairly quickly! We tend to think of traditional healers in general as following procedures cast in stone hundreds or thousands of years ago - a clearly unjustified stereotype. In this instance at least, there were intellectually flexible experimenters in the profession.
So what are the active principles in prickly poppy tea? The Lewis text indicates a-allocrytopine obtained from the roots as the active principle in treatment of heart arrhythmia. It also indicates that a more toxic mix of sanguinarine, berberine, protopine is present in the plants, and that prickly poppy occasionally contaminates grain. This may be from the seeds of the prickly poppy, which have been implicated in poisoning events in India. Sanguinarine is considered the primary culprit.
The leaves, however, have little sanguinarine, and the herbal tea, according to Borrell, is fairly non-toxic. Isolated berberine has shown some anti-malarial effect, but much weaker than that of whole leaf infusions. So it is not known exactly what mix of compounds in the leaves is so potent against malaria.
Argemone mexicana might turn out to be the tip of an iceberg. There are 32 species in this genus, native mostly to tropical America, with one species in Hawaii. Relationship among plants is highly predictive of similarity in secondary plant compounds. These other species may have similar or even better combinations of compounds for treating malaria or other parasites.
This is not to mention the numerous other genera and species of the poppy family. One must of course be very careful to steer away from the dangerous compounds found throughout this family, including the opiates in Papaver somniferum. As I say on the first day of my medical botany course: "DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME!" Self-experimentation with natural plant compounds is exceedingly risky. If you can get a hold of the Lewis text, there is an excellent section on all the ways people inadvertently poison themselves.
The study of medicinal botany is both ancient and very new. The new part is applying the modern scientific method to finding and verifying the curative or preventative properties of plant compounds. The possibilities and opportunities in this field are endless.
References:
Borrell, Brendan. 2014. Seeds of a Cure. Scientific American 310 (#6): 64-69.
Lewis, W. H. and M. P. F. Elvin-Lewis. 2003. Medical Botany, 2nd Ed., John Wiley and Sons.
Friday, February 21, 2014
The Birthplace of the Angiosperms
![]() |
The Fynbos of South Africa consists of drought-resistant evergreen shrubs and ephemeral herbaceous wildflowers. |
One
of the great thrills for any botanist, gardener, or wildflower enthusiast is a
visit to the southwestern tip of Africa in the springtime, as featured in the current series on my wildflower page. Rain falls mainly in the winter here, as it
does in southern Europe or California, creating a Mediterranean type of climate
at the tip of a largely tropical continent.
Rainfall varies, creating relatively lush shrublands, locally called
Fynbos, along the southern coast, and these grade into desert to the north and
west. The isolation, rough terrain, and
diversity of microhabitats has resulted in one of the richest and most
spectacular floras to be seen anywhere in the world. The moistening of the soil in the winter
releases a frenzy of growth and reproduction in plants that have been dormant
for 9 to 11 months, blanketing the usually barren fields and rocky hillsides
with brilliantly colored wildflowers. In
a month or two, the show is over and the Fynbos sleeps again.
According to some theories, the
flowering plants, or angiosperms, began their existence in an environment
similar to the semi-arid hills of southern Africa today. Such regions provide varied challenges to
both survival and reproduction. The short growing season and limited rainfall
in particular force plants to economize in numerous ways, to shorten their
reproductive cycles and decrease their exposure to the long dry summers. Many go dormant, surviving underground as
bulbs, corms, or tubers. Adaptations to such habitats by early
angiosperms opened the door to herbaceous life styles not available to the
slow-growing and slow-reproducing gymnosperms.
The Iris family, represented here by this brilliant Gladiolus, is one of the families that has diversified recently in semi-arid regions of Africa. |
The rough terrain of the South African uplands creates numerous microhabitats. |
For these reasons, botanists such as
Daniel Axelrod (1952) and G. Ledyard Stebbins (1974) proposed that semi-arid subtropical uplands similar to those seen in South Africa today serve as “cradles” of evolutionary innovation,
where successive waves of plant innovation have occurred. The cutting edge of plant evolution 120-180
million years ago consisted of the precursors of flowering plants. Lowland moist forests, long thought to be the
home of the first flowering plants, would have provided no incentives to shorten
the life cycle or invent new forms of vegetation. Diversification of early flowers and modes of
pollination also would have been favored in semi-arid environments, where
insects are abundant late in the wet season and compete fiercely with one
another for limited resources.
If this model of evolutionary cradles is
correct, it helps to explain Darwin’s “abominable mystery.”In the fossil
record, angiosperms appear rather abruptly, and in great diversity. There is no sign of the “missing links” between
earlier seed plants and those with flowers.
If early angiosperms and their precursors lived in hilly, semi-dry
environments, where fossilization rarely takes place, they would not have left
any traces in the rocks. Flowering plants, and the seed plants leading up to
them, may have lived in upland environments for millions of years before some
of their descendants moved into the forests and swamps of the lowland flood
plains, where fossilization was more likely.
The fossil record of angiosperms began with those lowland immigrants,
and by that time there were already many different kinds.
Before this “semi-arid upland” theory,
it was generally believed that angiosperms had evolved in moist lowland forests. This is where we find the most archaic living
angiosperms, such as Amborella, the
Austrobaileyales, and many magnolids. To Stebbins, however, such forests were
“museum” habitats that harbored refugees from earlier waves of evolution in the
dry uplands as they were replaced by newer forms of plant life. Successful new kinds of plants tend to
radiate into different habitats, including moist forests and wetlands. One early wave led to the waterlily order
(Nymphaeales), a very ancient lineage, but one that is still quite successful
and widespread today.
Think of a department store as an
analogy. The newest fashions are on the
front-line, full-price racks. This is
where the action is – where new fashion trends evolve and all the cool people buy their clothes. As these fashions are replaced by newer
designs, the remnants migrate to the bargain racks in the back of the
store. The clearance racks are the
museum habitat for clothing fashion.
Most will gradually disappear, but a few of the more interesting ones
may persist in actual museums featuring clothing fashions of past eras.
Despite that attractive logic, there are
still arguments that angiosperms may have in fact evolved in moist lowland
habitats. Taylor Feild (yes, his name is Feild, not Field, as I’ve had to explain numerous times to my spell-checker and one reviewer of my manuscript!) and colleagues (Feild et al.,
2004) have examined the
physiology of living archaic angiosperms, representing diverse families, and
found them fundamentally adapted to moist, shady, and disturbed habitats. According to the “dark and disturbed”
hypothesis, habitats subject to frequent disturbance would have promoted the
shorter life cycles and vegetative flexibility inherent to angiosperms. Genetic evidence indicates that these forest
adaptations appear to have been inherited from a common ancestor, suggesting
that they stemmed from the earliest angiosperms. So the ecology of angiosperm origins is not
yet fully agreed upon.
A
tale of stem and crown
Perhaps, however, the real story will
turn out to be a combination of the dry upland theory and the dark and
disturbed theory. Those advocating a
dry upland origin for angiosperms, were suggesting that the fundamental
features of angiosperms evolved gradually in upland habitats in the early
angiosperms or even pre-angiosperms. Feild,
on the other hand, suggested only that the angiosperms we know today had a
common ancestor that evolved in a dark, disturbed environment. What’s the difference between these two
statements?
All living angiosperms have a
hypothetical common ancestor, and together constitute the “crown group” of
angiosperms. That common ancestor was
not the very first angiosperm, however.
It emerged from a long line of early angiosperms and transitional pre-angiosperms,
which constituted the “stem group.” Aside
from the crown group ancestor and the living angiosperms that descended from it,
all stem angiosperms, by definition, are now extinct.
![]() |
The angiosperm stem group (yellow) consists of various extinct pre-angiosperms and early angiosperms. Modified from general diagram provided by Wikimedia commons. |
Early development of the angiosperms, and the
evolution of their key features, may very well have evolved among stem
angiosperms living in semi-dry uplands, as proposed by Axelrod and Stebbins. That environment still offers the greatest
stimulation for evolutionary change, and in particular for the types of changes
that led to the angiosperms. The early
angiosperm that was destined to give rise to all modern angiosperms, however,
apparently migrated into a “dark, disturbed” environment, where the finishing
touches of angiospermy were applied, giving rise to a diverse, flexible and
aggressive group of plants that came to dominate the earth. So the different theories, like blind men
feeling different parts of an elephant, described different parts of the story:
one begins where the other leaves off.
The real story may prove to be even more complex, however, for plants have
repeatedly moved from wet habitats to dry habitats and vice versa. Only time will tell.
References:
Axelrod, D. I.
1952. A Theory of Angiosperm Evolution. Evolution 6(1): 29-60.
Feild, T. S., N.
C. Arens, J. A. Doyle, T. E. Dawson, and M. J. Donoghue. 2004. Dark and
disturbed: a new image of early angiosperm ecology. Paleobiology 30: 82107.
Stebbins,
G. L. 1974. Flowering Plants. Evolution above the species level. Belknap Press of Harvard
University Press. Cambridge, MA.
Thursday, December 5, 2013
Mosses of Central Florida 5. Syrrhopodon incompletus
Syrrhopodon incompletus growing on the spongy trunk of a date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) on the University of South Florida campus |
Syrrhopodon incompletus Schwaegr. (Calymperaceae) is a relatively common moss found throughout the coastal plain of the southeastern U.S., occurring mostly on tree trunks, including palms, and exposed roots. It has a short upright stem with relatively large leaves, typically 3-5 mm in length, crowded into a circular pattern called a rosette ("rose-like"), and thus superficially resembles Octoblepharum. The leaves are thinner, however, just one cell thick except for the prominent midrib, with small teeth along the margins, and are translucent green.
![]() |
The large leaves have a strong midrib (or costa) and the basal region is composed of large, empty, rectangular cells. |
When dry, the leave roll into a tube and then twist and curl. |
The sporophytes arise from the tips of the stems, and the sporangia are upright and symmetrical. |
Friday, November 1, 2013
A leaf by any other name
![]() |
The leaf-like segments of Schlumbergera, are parts of the stem system. |
What
is a leaf? For practical purposes, it
might be any flat, photosynthetic plant organ.
Yet we know that there are certain “stems in leaf’s clothing” in the
botanical world. Cacti evolved in
deserts, where leaves were a liability, and thick, succulent stems took over
the job of photosynthesis. Many cacti
that have adapted as epiphytes in the tropics, such as Schlumbergera (Christmas cactus) and Epiphyllum,
however, have “reinvented leaves” by making their stem segments flat and
thin.
![]() |
Many brown algae produce large, leaf-like fronds. Line drawing from Allen & Gilbert, 1917, A textbook of botany. |
To be
fully convincing as a leaf, a structure must not only be flat and
photosynthetic, but also limited in size and shape (determinate), and produced
in a regular pattern around a central stem.
Leaves also have a certain lifespan, after which they fall off of the
plant, or sometimes remain as a dead skirt, as in Washingtonia palms. New
leaves are produced at the tips of stems that continue to elongate over
time. This would rule out leaf-like
cacti, in which the flat segments are produced one from another like links in a
chain. They are parts of indeterminate,
branching stem systems - stems in leaf’s clothing.
Even
within that more restrictive definition, flat photosynthetic appendages that
are commonly referred to as leaves have evolved independently many times. The leaf-like shape, not surprisingly, is
nature’s most efficient light gathering antenna, and so has been reinvented
over and over again. Many algae have adopted this highly successful growth
form. Kelp, for example, form underwater
forests of long stems bearing many leaf-like fronds produced in sequence from
an embryonic tip (an apical meristem).
![]() |
The "leaves" of leafy liverworts, like this Lejeunea, are flat extensions of the thallus. |
The
first flattened, photosynthetic structures to appear in land plants were the
thalli of ancient liverworts. A thallus
is a plant body that is not clearly defined into organs like stems and
leaves. A thalloid liverwort is flat and
photosynthetic, but grows and branches at its tip like a stem. Some liverworts are called “leafy
liverworts,” because their thalli are subdivided into small leaf-like segments
with slender stem-like sections in-between.
Mosses are more convincingly leafy, with
determinate, leaf-like
structures attached spirally around a stem, but purists prefer to not call any bryophyte
structures leaves because they evolved independently of the “true leaves” of
other land plants.![]() |
Club mosses, like this Lycopdiella cernua from Florida, have small scale-like leaves called microphylls. |
However,
the true leaves of vascular plants evolved at least twice from scratch, and
were subsequently completely remodeled several times. Early
land plants had perennial creeping stems, called rhizomes, plus short-lived upright shoots adapted for gathering
light and producing spores. The early
upright shoots were little more than green, forking stems, but competition for
light soon forced them to evolve more efficient light-gathering
structures. In clubmosses (Lycophytes) the
answer came in the form of flat but narrow leaves with a single vein of
vascular tissue running through them.
They are referred to technically as microphylls,
and are believed to have evolved as simple outgrowths of the surface tissues of
ancient stems. A more recent hypothesis
is that microphylls evolved from sporangia that were “sterilized” and flattened. Precursors of lycophytes produced numerous
sporangia on short stalks along the sides of their upright leafless stems. So converting some of them into leaves would
have been a fairly simple adaptation. In
either case, leaves of lycophytes can grow in length, but cannot develop
complex shapes or much breadth.
![]() |
The fronds of ferns are upright shoots flattened into a leaf-like configuration. From Smith, 1955, Cryptogamic Botany. |
The complex
fronds of ferns, which bear sporangia on their.
![]() |
The large complex leaves of ferns are called megaphylls. |
lower surfaces, as well as conducting photosynthesis are upright shoots that became leaf-like
through fine-branching and flattening. Such leaves are called megaphylls. Megaphylls can be called leaves because they are produced sequentially at the tips of the ongoing rhizomes, have a definite size and shape, and fall off of the plant after one or a few seasons
The
upright shoots of horsetails, cousins of the ferns, evolved a little
differently. They too are determinate,
photosynthetic, and spore-bearing, and are discarded after a defined period of
time, but they remained stem-like with smaller leaf-like segments. Though modern horsetails don’t have leaves,
their earliest ancestors had short, fan-shaped leaves born in a circular
arrangement at intervals along the upright shoots. They evolved a unique, bamboo way of growth,
in which stem segments elongate to extend the entire shoot quickly upward (see The
first “bamboos,” 28 Mar, 2012). These smaller leaves are also called
megaphylls, though each is equivalent to only part of the fern megaphyll. Spores are produced, not on the leaves, but
in specialized cones at the ends of upright shoots.
![]() |
This is an ancient horsetail ancestor called Lilpopia, with small megaphylls, each equivalent to just a small part of a fern frond. |
![]() |
Cycads have compound leaves descended from the fronds of seed ferns. |
![]() |
The leaves of the cycad Bowenia are doubly compound, and the most like ancient seed ferns. |
The
leaves of flowering plants, as well as cycads, are
![]() |
The leaves of conifers, such as this Araucaria, are simple, and flat or needle-like. |
![]() |
Angiosperm leaves, like this Tetrapanax, can be large and complex. |
Leaves in the eudicot family, Apiaceae, are typically compound, and can be quite fern-like, as in this variety of parsley. |
The
leaves of flowering plants, though evolving from seed-fern type ancestors, are
extremely varied in structure. Some are
complexly branched, like their ancestors, others are small and simple, even
scale-like in some cases. Their extreme
evolutionary plasticity demonstrates the innate potential for growth and
complexity inherent to the original megaphylls.
Angiosperm leaves, moreover,
develop in two different ways, in accordance with what we might call the “dicot
model” and the “monocot model.”
Dicotyledonous
plants occur in several distinct clades, mostly in the Eudicot clade, but also
in the more ancient Magnolid clade, and the most ancient clades of the ANITA
grade (Amborella, Nymphaeales, and Austrobaileyaceae – another long story!). In this developmental model, leaves begin as
tiny peg-like primordia at the tips of the stems, after which they develop
their characteristic shapes in miniature.
Complex, dissected, and irregular shapes develop through marginal
meristems expanding locally at different rates. After the shape has been formed (and in some
climates after a period of dormancy within a protected terminal bud), the
leaves expand two-dimensionally, increasing in size but retaining the shapes
developed in their infancy.
![]() |
In the eudicot, Liquidambar, leaves develop their shape first in miniature, then expand to their full size. |
In the
monocots, leaves being as hood-like primordial, with a basal sheath surrounding
the apical meristem, then expand primarily through basal growth (see How the
grass leaf got its stripes, 26 Jan 2012).
By growing only from the base, typical monocot leaves are long and
strap-like and their veins of vascular tissue run parallel to one another.
![]() |
The typical monocot leaf grows from the base, resulting in a strap-shaped structure and parallel veins. From Rost, et al., Plant Biology |
All of
these structures can be called leaves, though they develop in different
ways. Botanists will continue to use more
precise technical terms for leaf-like structures that evolved independently.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)